<article>
	<h1>The Irreplaceable Value of Human Decision-Making in the Age of AI</h1>
	<p>AI&apos;s rapid advancement has ignited enthusiasm about its potential to revolutionize corporate decision-making by substituting for expensive, fallible humans. But it&apos;s naive to believe that by gathering ever more data and feeding it to ever more powerful algorithms alone, businesses can uncover the truth, make the right decisions, and create value. We call this false belief <q>dataism.</q></p>
	<p>Decisions are not merely exercises in data aggregation and algorithmic analysis. They necessarily involve many additional nuanced elements, such as selecting trustworthy data sources, employing imagination to envision possibilities beyond available facts, and judging the feasibility of solutions. These are areas where humans have innate advantages over machines. Crucially, these involve implicit and often untrained human capabilities&hellip;</p>
	<div class="date">Published on 11<sup>th</sup> Dec</div>
	<cite>An excerpt from the HBR article</cite>
</article>

.date {
	offset: padding-box 100cqw 90deg / left 0 bottom -10px;
}
article { 
	container-type: inline-size;
	width: 400px; 
	padding-inline: 5px;
	border-radius: 4px; 
	background: linear-gradient(-135deg, rgb(240 247 250) 30%, rgb(170 232 251)); 
	box-shadow: 0 0 3px #eee;
	color: navy;
}
cite { font-size: .6rem; }
body {
	/* for demo purpose */
	height: max(100vh, 600px);
	margin: 0;
	display: grid;
	place-content: center;
	font: 14px poppins;
	user-select: none; -webkit-user-select:  none;
	cursor: default;
}

@media (orientation:portrait){
	article {
		width: 80vw;
	}
	body {
		height: max(100vh, 940px);
	}
}